<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
	
	<title>Vital Patterns: Comments on &quot;Homeopathy Myth: Diluting makes it stronger&quot;</title>
	<link>http://woowooscience.com/index.php/blog/post/homeopathy_myth_diluting_makes_it_stronger/</link>
	
    <description>in health, homeopathy, and life</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>john@vitalpatterns.net</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2008 by the respective commenters</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-04-04T06:58:00-08:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
	<atom:link href="http://woowooscience.com/index.php/blog/comment_rss_2.0/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    

		<item>
		<title>by Andy Lewis at Jan 22, 2008 11:06 pm</title>
		<link>http://woowooscience.com/index.php/blog/post/homeopathy_myth_diluting_makes_it_stronger/#211</link>
		<description>Can you point us to any published research that demonstrates a clear increase in &#8220;profoundness&#8221; with increased &#8220;succussion&#8221;?   Or for that matter, any good data to show that succussion is indeed different from mere dilution? (Note: Rustum Roy&#8217;s experiments failed to take into account different sources for the base solvents ethanol).   As for CDs. There is a clear and unambiguous test to separate CD with music on and blank ones. You play them. No such reliable test exists for homeopathic pills &#45; you could pass the quackometer challenge easily if this was so.   The reason for this is easy. CDs have been mechanically engineered to contain patterns of pits that encode music and rely on elaborate machinery to interpret the pattern of grooves. This is possible due to the carefully selected properties of layered plastics and films. Liquid water contains no such properties for the persistent storage of information or the human body any mechanism for reading and decoding any such data (or &#8216;similarity&#8217;) if it existed. Anyone who can show otherwise would make the scientific breakthrough of the century. Until then, it is parsimonious to believe homeopathy is just placebo &#45; that is what the data says.   Do you see why people might be sceptical?
		</description>
		<dc:subject>{categories backspace=&quot;1&quot;}{category_name}, {/categories}</dc:subject>
		<dc:date>2008-01-22T23:06:46-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>
	
		<item>
		<title>by John at Jan 23, 2008 10:55 am</title>
		<link>http://woowooscience.com/index.php/blog/post/homeopathy_myth_diluting_makes_it_stronger/#212</link>
		<description>DVDs, homeopathy. It’s a metaphor. Explaining how something could deeply affect you even though it’s small in quantity and not literally strong. Don’t get so hung up on the metaphor.  Shrek:&amp;nbsp; For your information, there&#8217;s a lot more to ogres than people think.  Donkey:&amp;nbsp; Example?   Shrek:&amp;nbsp; Example? Okay, er&#8230; ogres&#8230; are&#8230; like onions.   Donkey:&amp;nbsp; [sniffs onion] They stink?   Shrek:&amp;nbsp; Yes...NO!   Donkey:&amp;nbsp; Or they make you cry.   Shrek:&amp;nbsp; No!   Donkey:&amp;nbsp; Oh, you leave them out in the sun and they turn brown and start sproutin&#8217; little white hairs.   Shrek:&amp;nbsp; NO! LAYERS! Onions have layers. OGRES have layers. Onions have layers&#8230; you get it. We both have layers.   Donkey:&amp;nbsp; Oh, you both have layers. [pause] You know, not everybody likes onions. [pause] CAKES! Everybody loves cakes! Cakes have layers!  I’m not offering any proof here, just saying that &#8220;smaller amount makes it stronger&#8221; isn’t right. It is neither accurate nor is it a good metaphorical example.   And yes, I can see why people are skeptical. I remember well being skeptical myself. I’m not asking anybody not to be. My complaint is that when I read a description or criticism of homeopathy, it’s often has it wrong, either intentionally or out of ignorance.
		</description>
		<dc:subject>{categories backspace=&quot;1&quot;}{category_name}, {/categories}</dc:subject>
		<dc:date>2008-01-23T10:55:25-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>
	
		<item>
		<title>by woodchopper at Jan 27, 2008 01:53 am</title>
		<link>http://woowooscience.com/index.php/blog/post/homeopathy_myth_diluting_makes_it_stronger/#213</link>
		<description>Why shaking the remedy during the dilution process matters I don’t know. But I do know that a small amount alone does not produce the effect.  Could you post a reference to where this has been tested? It would be great to compare results between succussed and non&#45;succussed remedies.
		</description>
		<dc:subject>{categories backspace=&quot;1&quot;}{category_name}, {/categories}</dc:subject>
		<dc:date>2008-01-27T01:53:43-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>
	
		<item>
		<title>by GaleG at Jan 29, 2008 06:00 am</title>
		<link>http://woowooscience.com/index.php/blog/post/homeopathy_myth_diluting_makes_it_stronger/#216</link>
		<description>There is a big mix out there, and there&#8217;s lots of different things going on, and there is not one way that was intended to be the right way. Just like there&#8217;s not one color or one flower or one vegetable or one fingerprint. There is not one that is to be the right one over all others. The variety is what fosters the creativity. And so you say, &#8220;Okay, I accept that there&#8217;s lots of variety, but I don&#8217;t like to eat cucumbers.&#8221; Don&#8217;t eat cucumbers. But don&#8217;t ask them to be eliminated and don&#8217;t condemn those who eat them. Don&#8217;t stand on corners waving signs trying to outlaw the things that you don&#8217;t like. Don&#8217;t ruin your life by pushing against. Instead, say, &#8220;I choose this instead. This does please me.&#8221;
		</description>
		<dc:subject>{categories backspace=&quot;1&quot;}{category_name}, {/categories}</dc:subject>
		<dc:date>2008-01-29T06:00:12-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>
	
		<item>
		<title>by Andrew at Mar 01, 2008 08:27 am</title>
		<link>http://woowooscience.com/index.php/blog/post/homeopathy_myth_diluting_makes_it_stronger/#217</link>
		<description>But I do know that a small amount alone does not produce the effect.  Well, yes. Because there isn&#8217;t a small amount. There&#8217;s no amount at all. (Of course, there&#8217;s no effect either, but I can&#8217;t see you agreeing as readily with that.)   The reason people pick on this is partly because it goes against what we generally experience (a strange property in a homeopathic claim, given that homeopaths usually value experience over evidence), i.e., that dilution makes things weak, but also because if there was a &#8220;memory&#8221; effect in water, then repeatedly diluting and shaking that water would be exactly the kind of thing that would make the memory go away. That&#8217;s how these things always work. Entropy, dontchaknow?   Saying &#8220;it&#8217;s not the dilution; it&#8217;s the succussion&#8221; is like saying &#8220;it&#8217;s not saying abracadabra that makes it work; it&#8217;s my pointy hat&#8221;. It doesn&#8217;t make it any less silly.
		</description>
		<dc:subject>{categories backspace=&quot;1&quot;}{category_name}, {/categories}</dc:subject>
		<dc:date>2008-03-01T08:27:06-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>
	
		<item>
		<title>by mmo at Mar 17, 2008 05:55 pm</title>
		<link>http://woowooscience.com/index.php/blog/post/homeopathy_myth_diluting_makes_it_stronger/#219</link>
		<description>I think the smaller amount is at best safer but not necessarily the best.
		</description>
		<dc:subject>{categories backspace=&quot;1&quot;}{category_name}, {/categories}</dc:subject>
		<dc:date>2008-03-17T17:55:54-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>
	
		<item>
		<title>by John at Mar 18, 2008 06:43 am</title>
		<link>http://woowooscience.com/index.php/blog/post/homeopathy_myth_diluting_makes_it_stronger/#220</link>
		<description>Saying “it’s not the dilution; it’s the succussion” is like saying “it’s not saying abracadabra that makes it work; it’s my pointy hat”.  If I seem silly, you seem sloppy. I say something like, &#8220;People get better when I say abracadabra.&#8221; And then you go around saying, &#8220;That guy is so silly. He thinks he cures people with his pointy hat.&#8221;   Criticize accurately. You know, be like a scientist.
		</description>
		<dc:subject>{categories backspace=&quot;1&quot;}{category_name}, {/categories}</dc:subject>
		<dc:date>2008-03-18T06:43:16-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>
	

    </channel>
</rss>